Next: What is the Place
Up: Design Considerations for Kimwitu
Previous: Why a Type per
How are the various objects generated by the system named?
The problem is that for each input name (e.g. of a phylum or operator) a
number of identifiers in the output are generated (e.g. for an operator a
name is generated to distinguish it from other operators, and a name for
creating a term with that operator etc.).
The basic idea is that related concepts have related names.
In natural languages a comparable situation exists.
For example, in English the words norm,
normal,
normalcy,
normality,
normalization,
normalize,
normalized,
normalizes,
normalizeth,
normalizing,
normally, and
normalness,
denote different but related forms of one word.
These other words are called inflections, and are constructed, in most
western languages, by changing suffixes.
In other languages, e.g. Swahili , prefix changing is also used.
In Swahili, the word
witu
means tree, its plural, meaning forest or jungle, is
mwitu .
The prefix
ki-
indicates a likeness of being, so that the name of our system reads as
tree-s-ish. (This may not sound like English to you. Well, Swahili speakers don't count
Kimwitu
as a legal word either...)
The same scheme is employed in programming languages.
For example, in Algol-68 and C, `proc()' denotes the result of calling a
parameterless function and `proc' denotes the function itself.
An example from the term processor:
the function to rewrite a phylum
foo
is called
rewrite_foo.
Next: What is the Place
Up: Design Considerations for Kimwitu
Previous: Why a Type per
2000-04-17